The Origin of Astrology Kirk Straughen (Investigator 105, 2005 November) Introduction
Astrology is
an ancient art that has been and still is practiced in
many parts of the world. Its origin lies in the ancient Middle East,
and from here appears to have spread to Greece, India and China. The
Maya and Aztecs of South America also had a form of astrology, however
their art appears to be of independent origin as there is no evidence
of contact between these civilisations and those of the Old World.
In this article I have confined my examination of astrology to its occidental branch. According to
astrologers, various celestial bodies influence the
destinies of Earth's inhabitants. Moreover, they also claim that it is
possible to predict the future by analysing the positions of the
planets as they move across the zodiac:
"Astrology explores the effect of the sun, moon, and eight of the planets of the solar system upon the earth and its inhabitants. It is a convention in astrology to refer to the sun and the moon as planets, and to view the universe as if the earth were at its centre...
I will now examine the origin and history of
astrology, its theoretical basis, and if there is any substance to its
alleged predictive powers.
Babylonian Beginnings
The origin of astrology can be traced back to 2000 BC when Babylonian
priests began to consult the heavens in an attempt to determine the
fate of kings and empires. The underlying assumption behind their
reasoning was that each planet was the abode of a god who influenced
earthly affairs:
The Babylonians believed
that the Universe was controlled by a hierarchy of supernatural beings
and that mankind was the servant of these gods who ruled the
terrestrial world Marduk (Jupiter) was the creator and victor over the
forces of chaos, and king of the gods; Sin (the Moon) influenced growth
through its changing phases; Samas (the Sun) was the carrier of life
and light; Nebo (Mercury) was the god of wisdom who recorded the deeds
of men; Adar (Saturn) was the patron of hunting; Nergal (Mars) was the
god of the dead, pestilence and war, and Ishtar (Venus) was the goddess
of motherhood.
The Babylonians came to believe that the will of their gods could be
divined by the position of the planets as they moved across the zodiac
which is also of Babylonian origin:
Astrology became popular in ancient Greece when Berosus, a Babylonian
astrologer, founded a school devoted to the art on the island of Cos in
250 BC. The Greeks proceeded to develop the mundane astrology of the
Babylonians into the genethliacal version that deals with the destiny
of ordinary people, rather than confining itself to the fate of kings
and empires.
In addition, astrology also acquired the Greek concept of the universe as expounded in Claudius Ptolemaeus' (c. 100-170 AD) Almagest the spherical Earth was thought to be the centre of the cosmos, was surrounded by a complex system of concentric crystalline spheres to which the celestial bodies were attached and by which they were moved. The order of the celestial bodies, from the earth outwards, was as follows: the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, and beyond the sphere of Saturn was the sphere of the fixed stars. From Greece, astrology entered Roman civilisation and spread throughout the Empire, and although it was condemned on theological grounds by the Church in the early part of its history, the art eventually became respectable and was incorporated into the world picture of western civilisation the great chain of being in which all things were part of an interconnected realm where:
Despite its widespread
acceptance, even among learned men, there were a small number of people
sceptical of astrology.
One such person was the Italian humanist Pico della Mirandola (1463 - 94) who:
The high regard in which
astrology was held came to an end when advances were made in the
science of astronomy. This was brought about by the work of men such as
Copernicus and Galileo who correctly deduced that the planets revolved
about the Sun. Thus, one of the central assumptions upon which
astrology was founded the Earth centred universe was shown to be
false.
Theory
After having given a very brief outline of the origin and history of
astrology, it should be obvious that the foundations of the art are
based on superstition the idea that the planets are the abode of gods
who influence earthly affairs.
Contemporary astrologers have abandoned the idea of planetary gods, and replaced them with a theory of positive and negative vibrations that, according to them, affect human destiny. However, they still believe that the moment of birth is of prime importance in determining the fate and personality of individuals:
The assumption that the moment of birth is a crucial factor in
determining personality appears to be questionable at best, for if
there are such things as celestial influences, then the foetus would be
continually subjected to them throughout the term of its development.
Therefore, the moment of conception should be the primary factor that
astrologers base their predictions upon.
Moreover, if astrologers are correct in assuming that the moment of birth determines personality, then it should follow that twins, whether identical (where two embryos arise from the division of a single fertilised egg) or fraternal (where two different eggs are fertilised), should have different personalities because the second twin can be born within a few minutes or up to 15 minutes of the first:
Unfortunately for astrologers, it is our genes, rather than the time of birth that determines personality:
As we can see, identical
twins even if born 15 minutes apart, and according to astrologers under
different celestial influences, will still have personalities that are
remarkably similar. This is in direct contrast to fraternal twins who,
even if born within a few minutes of each other, will have
personalities that are dissimilar.
Is there any evidence that celestial bodies emit vibrations that might effect human destiny? It is all very well for astrologers to claim that they do, however where is the proof? We have explored the Moon, sent space probes to other planets in the solar system, and have discovered that these worlds are composed of the same kind of matter as found on Earth. In order for the planets to emit some kind of paranormal radiation, they would need to be composed of paranormal matter because matter and energy are interdependent. To date no paranormal matter has been discovered, and therefore there is no evidence that these vibrations exist outside the imagination of astrologers. The zodiac too, poses a number of problems, for the constellations are nothing more than arbitrary patterns formed by human imagination. Moreover, there are currently 88 recognised constellations and if they possess some mystical quality, why is it that astrologers take into account only 12 of them? Another problem is that the signs of the zodiac have, in the last two thousand years, been displaced thirty degrees westward due to the precession of the Earth's axis, a cyclic phenomena that occurs over a period of approximately 26,000 years. Therefore, a person born on 21 March 130 AD would have entered the world under the constellation of Aries. However, a person born on the same date today would enter the world under the constellation of Pisces. Astrologers have not taken this phenomenon into account if you consult a contemporary book on astrology you will find that the date for the star sign Aries is still being given as March 21 - April 19, and Pisces as February 19 - March 20. One can only conclude that astrology is woefully out of date. Astrologers have tried to overcome this problem by claiming that each constellation was 'born' in its respective house, and therefore their current positions are irrelevant. However, if a constellation can be born, presumably in some mystical manner, so that its influences are fixed, then it seems reasonable to assume that this event would have occurred 4.6 billion years ago when the Earth and other planets in our solar system began to form out of a swirling cloud of dust and gas. Unfortunately for astrologers their solution is not viable. This is because no constellation is immutable – the unequal rates of movement among the stars that comprise them causes all constellations to change shape over time, and 4.6 billion years ago the constellations of the zodiac, as we know them, did not exist. If a constellation exerts paranormal influences due to the arrangement of its stars, then it seems reasonable to assume that these influences change as the constellations alter shape. Moreover, the position of the Earth and the other planets in the zodiac changes because our solar system is moving in relation to the constellations as the Sun orbits the centre of our galaxy (in the Sun's case once every 250 million years.) Needless to say, astrologers have not taken into account all these changes in the position of the celestial bodies their art is based on the ancient and discredited idea of a largely static cosmos. Predictions
Despite the fact that there is no rational foundation to astrology, many people are impressed by astrological predictions, and then claim that this alleged accuracy can only be accounted for by postulating the existence of paranormal forces. Is this assumption justifiable? Consider the following personality reading: "You have a very independent streak and like to do things in a way that is just right for you.1 It may be that you have evolved a unique lifestyle that you guard jealously.2 You will express your originality in a variety of ways.3 Perhaps you like to look a little different, or maybe your job is an unusual one.4 Your ... creativity could be spiced with originality and that will make inner fulfilment even more likely for you.5 Can you identify the zodiac sign that this reading corresponds to? My guess is that you can't, and I suspect that neither could an astrologer unless he or she looks at the answer at the end of this article. Give a copy of this reading to a person you know believes in astrology, tell them that the reading is for their star sign, and ask them to rate its accuracy on a scale from 1 to 10. I suspect that most people will give it a rating higher than five. Why? The answer is simple the reading is full of generalities (as are most astrological predictions) that could apply to almost anyone. Each sentence in the above quote has been numbered in superscript, and I shall now analyse the reading in order to highlight its generic nature. 1. Most people like to think that they are independent, and tend to do things in a manner that they find best for them. Very few people would disagree with this statement. Because most astrological personality readings are of a generic character, it is easy for people to make the mistake of what psychologists call the "fallacy of personal validation" where a person convinces themselves that a statement is applicable to them, even though it may only be partly so. This mistake can occur if the person believes, even to a slight degree, that astrology may contain a grain of truth. Another technique used by astrologers (and most other fortune tellers) to add credence to their art, is the obtaining of information from their clients by subtle questioning and deduction. For example, a pale band of skin where a wedding ring should be may indicate divorce or the death of a spouse. Information obtained by careful observation and questioning can then be fed back to the client, and create a false impression that the astrologer and his art are capable of producing accurate predictions. Other methods astrologers can employ in an attempt to increase their accuracy are as follows the use of statistics, polls and surveys in order to obtain information about the population, and thereby obtain a profile of the average person or a specific group. For example, research carried out at the Monash Population and Urban Research Centre at Monash University, has revealed that many unemployed or low-income earning men are unable to attract or keep partners the stress caused by their situation interferes with the formation of relationships. In addition, many women appear to be unwilling to commit themselves to men in this situation. An astrologer who is conversant with these findings may be able to deduce, after having established his client's financial situation by observation or subtle questioning, potential or actual relationship problems. Conclusion
The predictive powers of astrology are illusionary. Astrologers rely on generic personality readings, statistics, subtle questioning and psychological manipulation to convince their clients that they are capable of providing them with a glimpse of future events. Moreover, their clients often fall victim to the fallacy of personal validation, and thereby convince themselves that the prediction is more accurate than it really is. The theory upon which the art is founded the idea that celestial influences at birth determine personality and destiny is not supported by any empirical evidence. The reason why belief in astrology persists, despite this fact, is because human nature has remained basically the same since the days of ancient Babylon – people desire certainty in their lives, they wish to know what the future holds in order to take advantage of opportunities and avoid disasters, and astrology holds out this hope to people who are willing to believe. Answer: Aquarius. Bibiography: Bergamini, D. et al The Universe, Time Inc., 1964. Bosanko, S. (Ed.) How to Predict Your Future, Treasure Press, London, 1988. Eysenck, H. & M. Mindwatching, Michael Joseph Ltd., London, 1981. Gordon, H. Extra Sensory Deception, Macmillan of Canada, 1988. Lewinsohn, R. Prophets and Prediction, Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd., London, 1961. MacNeice, L. Astrology, Aldus Books Ltd., London, 1964. McIntosh, C. Astrologers & Their Creed, Arrow Books Ltd., London, 1971. Mitton, S. (Ed.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Astronomy, Jonathan Cape Ltd., London, 1977. Myles, M. F. Textbook For Midwives (8th edition), Churchill Livingston, New York, 1975. Parker, J. & D. Sun & Moon Signs, Lifetime Distributors, Australia, 1997. Seligmann, K. The History of Magic and the Occult, Gramercy Books, New York, 1997. Tauber, G.E. Man's View of the Universe, Crown Publishers Inc., New York, 1979. Tillyard, E. M. W. The Elizabethan World Picture, Penguin Books Ltd., England, 1976. The Paranormal on
this website: |